So, what is an inversion narrative?

More specifically, what is the inversion narrative?

“Inversion Narrative” is a term used to describe how every major narrative promoted throughout the society you live in is inverted or false (lies). The public is misled by the rulers that be through lies, misinformation, and conflict of interest.

One example is the stock market community. The inversion narrative here is that “you can quit your job and make money by using this strategy and this indicator”. The public blindly believes this and loses their money to brokerages and by proxy, investment banks that fund the brokerages. These institutions depend on the retail trader’s money and require a steady supply of “traders” who pay them money through fees, margin calls, spreads, losses, and other ways including stop-loss hunting, data mining, taking the opposite position as the traders, and other underhanded means. The steady stream of new traders is deliberately misinformed through brokerage courses, social media influencers, YouTube personalities, and forums that teach the public “knowledge” regarding technical indicators, which stock to pick, etc. This builds the public’s confidence in their trading skills and they press the buy or sell button like sheep walking into the slaughterhouse. Often, these YouTubers (they always have a link to the brokerage in the description) have contracts with the brokerages to market to new customers, and forums are paid by the brokerages to push their narratives (ads). Fake profiles, sock puppets, and echo chambers are a few more ways to deceive the public.

The key points to note concerning the inversion narrative here are:

1. Conflict of Interest between brokers and traders

2. Presence of an intermediary (brokerage)

3. Disinformation through channels of information like TV, social media, peers, etc.

These are the 3 components of The Inversion Narrative.

The inversion narrative is extended to almost all other aspects of human existence:

Politics – Politicians are the intermediary between you and the state and often spew disinformation to get you to vote for them. Their conflict of interest arises as they need to placate their backers and investors and not their voters.

Healthcare – Doctors are the intermediary between you and health (giving clear disinformation) and prescribe you medicines to placate their backers (pharmaceutical industry) which often have bad effects on you (conflict of interest)

Education – Teachers are the intermediary between you and a good job. They push all kind of disinformation on the young students and mold their minds into conformist slaves due to the requirements of the industry (conflict of interest)

Religion – The Pope is the intermediary between you and God (how they got away with this is beyond comprehension) and often spews disinformation to the believers that keep them in line and good slaves to the system (conflict of interest)

Secular Media – The media is the intermediary between you and the actual news which is a conflict of interest due to their political and financial backers and will not provide you with true or relevant news. Has an overall negative effect on the viewer.

With the internet, it has become easier than ever before to spread disinformation and lies to millions with a single click.

How?

The inversion narrative is spread on numerous websites, forums, and social media platforms. Countless people are fooled and misled into participating or giving consent to activities that actually do not serve their best interests and in some cases, even harm them.

We should note that with all of the censorship (including “cancel culture”), inverted narratives, and general negativity, we should be extremely careful when reading information on the internet and “feeding” our minds with the “news feed” which is more or less peddling misinformation or incomplete information, lies, and keeps the reader in a state of doubt and fear or being emotional. On the other hand, disconnecting from the internet and going out for an hour for a walk will do wonders for your psyche.

With that said, let’s take a look at how to recognize disinformation and then some effective countermeasures.

Signatures of Disinformation:

  1. Arguments starting with “many people”, “the consensus is” etc. are a collective consciousness, groupthink, or hive mind and are most of the time deluded and mistaken.
  2. Only talks about views or feelings without any solutions.
  3. Quick to baselessly deny or malign others who do not share their point of view.
  4. Threatening or bullying while making arguments to persuade you to believe or follow their narrative.
  5. Manipulative statements like “don’t you want this to stop?”, “I would do ABC if I were you”, “don’t you believe/trust me?” and “many people can tell you that ABCD” etc.
  6. Statements like “are you okay?”, “We are concerned for you” etc. but with no constructive criticism nor attempts at finding possible solutions.
  7. Inconsistency in words and narratives like statements without proof.
  8. Asserting Crow’s Law: “Do not believe what you want to believe until you know what you ought to know.”
  9. No Occam’s Razor: Hypotheses are not to be multiplied without necessity, given missing, ambiguous, and contradictory information. Intelligence people seek the simplest hypotheses that will account for the information on hand.
  10. Crabtree’s Bludgeon: No set of mutually inconsistent observations can exist for which human intellect cannot conceive a coherent explanation, however complicated. This is simplified as “attempting to make too much out of too little”. If a “supporting” or tangential narrative is being asserted as true without first proving the initial narrative to be true, that is a slippery slope logical fallacy and a prime instance of Simpson’s Paradox, which is simplified as drawing a conclusion with an incomplete data set…only to satisfy beliefs and emotions.
  11. Through experience and analysis, one can often predict the source of disinformation and the “scheme” of the false narrative.
  12. Disjointed incongruities involve inconsistencies that have become, in the perceptions of the viewer if not in fact, separated or mismatched. The incongruities are not recognized because the different sets of inconsistent patterns are never paired. Jokes, hoaxes, and deceptions all rely on disjointed incongruities. For example, observer A perceives situation A and observer B perceives situation B. It may be the case that situations A and B are representations of the same situation, but unfortunately, this situation is not the true situation, which is C. For example, person A believes that Republicans will fix the economy, and person B believes that the Democrats will fix the economy when in fact, both political parties are the two wings of the same bird or two sides of the same coin because they are both responsible for what happens or doesn’t happen concerning government actions.
  13. The pairing of two or more apparently inconsistent patterns that represent a consistent underlying reality. These complicate the task of incongruity testing by adding clutter to the process. They can result from different perspectives of the underlying pattern or as the result of people’s paralogical inclination to falsely detect order in chaotic patterns. For example, conspiracy A talks about reptilians and NWO as conspiracy B talks about NWO and 13 bloodlines. Therefore, the 13 bloodlines are reptilians and they are supposedly the same in some way but it is all complete bullshit. There is no NWO, no reptilians, and no 13 bloodlines.
  14. They rely exclusively on nonmaterial evidence without reason or logic.
  15. They rely on agents who have not been seen or directly contacted.
  16. Discrepancies in the agent’s reporting.
  17. “Stomping The Monkey”: Answering questions with irrelevant questions and never giving a direct answer to the questions they are asked, changing the subject multiple times and avoiding any immediate challenges, repeatedly asking questions without giving the opportunity for an answer, or repeatedly answering questions that were not asked. All of this is an attempt to overwhelm the deceiver’s target, seeking to humiliate the target and satisfy the deceiver’s schadenfreude.

To see a real example of ALL of the disinformation signatures listed above in action, watch videos of Jen Psaki, the White House Press Secretary for the Biden Administration. EVERY time she speaks, she is spewing misinformation (lies). She has exhibited ALL of the 17 disinformation signatures listed above. President Biden has done the same, as well as every President in American history or the history of any country.

Counter-Deception:

  1. For deception and disinformation to work, the deceiver will try to control as many of the channels available to the target as possible. This includes books, social media, education systems, news channels, etc.
  2. Making assumptions and predictions explicit it is easier for the target to maintain preexisting beliefs even in the face of evidence that contradicts those beliefs implying that it is important to examine one’s own beliefs for exploitable weaknesses in order to be less susceptible to deception.
  3. The use of devil’s advocates emphasizes the need for encouraging the formulation and application of alternative images or ideas, noting that it is often politically and psychologically difficult for any one person to consider multiple alternatives.
  4. Making sure that identities and missions do not become linked with specific theories and images; is often seen in spiritual and alien abduction-related conspiracies.
  5. Awareness of common misperceptions (knowing about the inversion narrative).
  6. Consider alternative views and narratives instead of trying to eliminate cognitive biases, decision-makers should take advantage of them in order to produce differing perspectives of a given situation.
  7. First, the deception target identifies inconsistencies between his observations and his expectations for the observations. The target then determines that those inconsistencies are functional to the goals of the deceiver. Finally, the deception target identifies the potential actions of the deceiver that can be associated with one or more deception tactics and assesses the deceiver’s ability to create the observed inconsistencies.
  8. The Plus-Minus Rule: A single false characteristic…one the real entity does not possess (a plus) or one the fake entity lacks (a minus) is sufficient to prove the entity is fake.
  9. The Congruity-Incongruity Rule: Real entities are completely congruent with all of their characteristics. Therefore, every false entity will display at least one incongruity.
  10. Verification: It is always possible to find a way to verify a hypothesis if it is true.
  11. The Law of Multiple Sensors – Multiple sensors will almost always prove more effective than a single one, even when each is less precise.
  12. Passive and Active Detection: Deception may be detected by analysis (passive) supported by active intervention aimed at collecting missing key facts. This intervention takes the form of defining new collection requirements or by running controlled experiments, including the use of traps and tripwires, to trick the adversary into betraying himself.
  13. Pre-Detection: Predicting an adversary’s deception plans by analysis of his deceptive style, capabilities, and goals
  14. Penetration and Counter-Espionage: The adversary’s deception plans can be discovered through the use of penetrating the adversary’s organization with human agents or technical collection devices and discovering the deceiver’s double agents within one’s own organizations.
  15. The Prepared Mind and Intuition: The ability to not only discover the meaning of chance events but also make effective use of that knowledge depends wholly on systematic mental preparation. Such mental preparation also makes intuition possible.
  16. Indirect Thinking and The Third Option: The goal of indirect thinking is to come up with an indirect answer—the third option that the adversary was not expecting.
  17. Bubsy’s Ombudsman: The essence of the Ombudsman Method is to force one to confront straight on that nagging, almost subliminal, sense of unease about a situation or person that somehow does not seem quite right, that does not quite fit as it should. Those little incongruities signal a deception in progress.
  18. Searching For Common Themes In The Disinformation: Almost all inverse narratives (lies), specifically conspiracy theories, have the reader in a state of fear, anger, helplessness, and frustration due to the projection of power and authority with no justice for the victims and punishments for the perpetrators’ insight. eg: 9/11, Bengahzi, Watergate, Targeted Individuals, NWO, etc.

Now, you can understand why you see conflicting information being reported about almost every major issue you hear about in the mainstream media. The purpose for it is to make people mentally catatonic…unable to think for themselves. When people don’t or can’t think for themselves, they must rely on others to think for them and they will seek being told what to do by the authoritative entities that push inversion narratives.

Learn More